Thu, Nov 14, 2024 | Jumada al-Awwal 12, 1446 | DXB ktweather icon0°C

India: Hijab ban case in Karnataka reaches split verdict; matter to be placed before CJI

The apex court had earlier reserved its order on petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court upholding the ban on the garment in educational institutions

Published: Thu 13 Oct 2022, 11:37 AM

  • By
  • ANI

Top Stories

Photo: AP

Photo: AP

On Thursday, the Supreme Court pronounced a split verdict in the Karnataka Hijab ban case.

A bench of justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia pronounced the judgement. While Justice Gupta dismissed the petitions against the hijab ban, the latter allowed them.

One of the lawyers representing the petitioner said that the matter would be placed before the Chief Justice of India, who would decide whether a new bench was to hear the matter, or if it was to be referred to a larger bench.

Justice Gupta dismissed appeals challenging the Karnataka High Court's order, which had upheld the state government's order to ban wearing hijabs in educational institutions of the state.

He explained that there is a "divergence of opinion ... In my order, I have framed 11 questions. First is whether the appeal should be referred to the Constitution Bench."

Justice Dhulia allowed the appeals, and set aside the Karnataka High Court order.

"It's a matter of choice, nothing more nothing less," he affirmed, while pronouncing the order.

The apex court had earlier reserved its order on various petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court upholding the ban on hijab in educational institutes.

The arguments in the matter went on for 10 days, in which 21 lawyers from the petitioners' side, as well as Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, and Karnataka Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi argued for the respondents.

The court was hearing various pleas against the Karnataka HC's judgement upholding the Karnataka Government's decision to direct educational institutes to prescribe uniforms in educational institutes.

Addressing the court, Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, in his rejoinder submission, had said that the Karnataka Government Circular, which enforced the dress code, has no reference to the Popular Front of India (PFI).

Various petitioners have approached the apex court challenging the controversial Karnataka HC order.

One of the appeals in the top court has alleged that it is the "step-motherly behaviour of government authorities which has prevented students from practising their faith ... [resulting] in an unwanted law and order situation".

The appeal said that the High Court in its impugned order had "vehemently failed to apply its mind and was unable to understand the gravity of the situation, as well as the core aspect of the Essential Religious Practices enshrined under Article 25 of the Constitution of India".

A bench of the Karnataka High Court, comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit, and Justice JM Khazi had earlier held that the prescription of uniform was a reasonable restriction that students could not object to, and dismissed various petitions challenging a ban on hijab in educational institutions, saying they were without merit.

ALSO READ:

The hijab row erupted in January this year when the Government PU College in Udupi allegedly barred six hijab-clad girls from entering. Following this, the girls sat in protest outside the college over being denied entry.

This led to boys of several colleges in Udupi attending classes in saffron scarves. The protest spread to other parts of the state as well, leading to protests and agitations in several places in Karnataka.

As a result, the Karnataka government said that all students must adhere to the uniform and banned both hijab and saffron scarves, until an expert committee decided on the issue.

On February 5, the pre-University education board released a circular stating that the students could only wear the uniform approved by the school administration, and that no other religious attire would be allowed in colleges.



Next Story