From Dubai to the World: Jumeirah Golf Estates' Stephen Deane on a global mission to nurture amateur golf talent
sports32 minutes ago
Frankly, I’m not sure I know what it is that so appeals to the show’s dedicated fans either. And, at present, at least, I’m a Doctor Who agnostic.
But you need history to get some idea of the show’s provenance. The thing to remember is that it is vastly older than many of the people who watch it. The first episode was telecast in1963, three days after John F Kennedy was assassinated.
Science fiction was going through a low phase in America in 1963 so Doctor Who was a peculiarly British show.
Our hero had no spaceship. Instead, he had a phone booth. But this was no ordinary phone booth. For one, it could hurtle through time and space (it tended to materialise rather than fly). For another, it defied the known laws of physics by being much bigger (as big as a country house in some episodes) on the inside than on the outside (where it looked like any other 1960s phone booth.)
I never watched the early Doctor Who episodes too closely but, from what I recall, Doctor Who was an old, rather cranky fellow who was usually accompanied by a young adolescent assistant presumably to give the kids who watched the show a character they could connect with.
And it was the kids the BBC was aiming for. The original Doctor Who was a kiddie show, broadcast during kiddie viewing times and made on the paltry budgets that traditionally characterised children’s television.
The first was its theme tune, played by what was described as the BBC’s Radiophonic Workshop, which predated Kraftwerk and the era of electronic music by a decade and a half. The second was the creation of the Daleks, murderous robots who kept muttering “Ex-term-inate” each time an enemy got too close. The Daleks were a great invention. They endure to the present day and their catchphrase still resonates.
By the time I got into Doctor Who, several actors had come and gone in the title role. The show’s writers had come up with the brilliant idea that as Doctor Who was a Time Lord he could not die. However, he would regenerate into a new body. So, each time a new actor took over the role, the plot included a regeneration sequence.
My favourite Doctor was Jon Pertwee who played him in the early Seventies, as a wry, Oxbridge-type know-it-all. More influential was Pertwee’s successor, Tom Baker, who set the template for today’s Doctor, played the character without Pertwee’s elevated stature and adding a touch of mad unpredictability to the Doctor’s behaviour.
Then, I grew older and lost interest. Doctors came and went till in 1989, after more than 25 years on the air, Doctor Who was cancelled by the BCC.
That should have been that. But in 2005, the BBC allowed Russell T Davies (who was born in the year that the first episode was telecast) to relaunch the franchise as a more adult show (with adult budgets and viewing times). Davies had made his name with such shows as Queer as Folk and The Second Coming and had no real reputation in the area of children’s programming or science fiction. This turned out to be a good thing because his reinvention of the franchise had a serious actor, Christopher Eccleston as Doctor Who, and moved away from the clichés of the genre.
The series became an instant critical and ratings success and long-time fans (i.e., everyone of a certain age in Britain) waited for Davies to re-introduce all the old Doctor Who standbys such as the Tardis, the Daleks, the Master (a kind of super-villain), the Cybermen (more villains), etc.
When the new Doctor Who became a global phenomenon and a huge earner for the BBC (which still shows it around the world and sells it to TV stations in other countries), Eccleston made way for a new Doctor, David Tennant — who went on to become the most popular Doctor Who in the show’s history.
After five years, Russell Davies moved on and Steven Moffat (who also does the brilliant Sherlock) replaced him and eventually Matt Smith became the 11th (or is it 12th? There is some dispute) actor to play Doctor Who. The Moffat-Smith version is still one of the best-regarded shows on British TV and continues to win fans all over the world.
Speaking for myself, however, I’ve stopped watching. It is not that there’s anything wrong with this Doctor Who series. In fact, when I have caught the odd episode on TV, I’ve been struck by how much better the show is than most science fiction hokum: it is far better than the Star Trek re-boot, for instance, and it’s certainly a lot better than the three crappy Star Wars prequels that George Lucas churned out.
But I guess science fiction just doesn’t do it for me any longer. And at some level, I still prefer the simple Doctor Who stories of my childhood rather than the grown-up plots they have today.
But don’t let that stop you. You should see the show and make up your own mind.
(Vir Sanghvi is a celebrated Indian journalist, television personality, author and lifestyle writer. To follow Vir’s other writings, visit www.virsanghvi.com)
From Dubai to the World: Jumeirah Golf Estates' Stephen Deane on a global mission to nurture amateur golf talent
sports32 minutes ago
Using mobile phones while driving, tailgating and sudden deviation are among the offences
transport44 minutes ago
New Delhi ready to help achieve a truce to end conflict, says Indian Prime Minister
europe47 minutes ago
Six entities in China added to the list for allegedly acquiring US-origin items to support Beijing's military modernisation
asia52 minutes ago
The graduation capped off a series of courses at Montgomerie Golf Club, Emirates Golf Club, and Dubai Creek Golf & Yacht Club
sports53 minutes ago
The creative minds and stars share their experiences on bringing 'Citadel: Honey Bunny' to reality
entertainment55 minutes ago
After Navalny's death, his wife Yulia Navalnaya was added to Russia's 'terrorists and extremists' blacklist in July
europe1 hour ago
The company will sell over 2.582 billion shares through a three-tranche IPO which will start on October 28 and close on November 5
markets1 hour ago