E-Paper
Sign In
iPhone | iPad
Android
Mon, Dec 30, 2024 | Jumada al-Aakhirah 29, 1446 | DXB
0°C
US takes on Google's ad tech empire in antitrust trial
Google's lawyer Karen Dunn dismissed the allegations as an ill-founded attempt by the government to pick 'winners and losers'
Google lead attorney Karen Dunn speaks with a colleague outside the courthouse, as opening arguments began in Google's second antitrust case. REUTERS
Google faced its second major antitrust trial in less than a year on Monday as the US government accused the tech giant of dominating online advertising and stifling competition.
The trial in a federal court in northern Virginia followed a separate case where a judge last month found Google's search business to be an illegal monopoly.
This new battle, also brought by the US Department of Justice, focuses on ad technology -- the complex system determining which online ads people see and their cost.
The US government specifically alleges that Google controls the market for publishing banner ads on websites, including those of many creators and small news providers.
"This technology may be modern, but the practices (shown by Google) are as old as monopolies themselves," Julia Tarver Wood, a lawyer for the Department of Justice, told a packed courtroom.
In her opening statement, Tarver Wood said Google has used its financial power to acquire potential rivals and corner the ad tech market, leaving advertisers and publishers with no choice but to use its technology.
Through acquisitions, "Google used its monopoly to make a new set of ad tech tools that are necessary to keep the internet alive," she added.
"Publishers were understandably furious and the evidence will show that they could do nothing," she said.
According to the US government, websites show more than 13 billion display ads every day, bringing in roughly $12 billion to publishers, much of which goes through Google's ad tech.
The US government is seeking to have Google divest parts of its ad tech business.
Google's lawyer Karen Dunn dismissed the allegations as an ill-founded attempt by the government to pick "winners and losers" in a diverse market that should be dismissed due to US legal precedent.
The company insisted that the case is based on an outdated version of the internet, ignoring similar situations in which ads are also placed in search results, apps and social media platforms.
"The plaintiff's case is a little like a time capsule where you will find a Blackberry and an iPod..." said Dunn in her opening statement.
She warned that if Google were to lose the case, the winners would be other tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta or Amazon, whose market share in online advertising "is ascendent as Google's share is falling."
The first witness called by the US government was Tim Wolfe, an executive from Gannett newspapers, the publisher of USA Today and hundreds of local news providers in the US
He told the court that his company saw "no alternative" than Google.
Its ad tech tools offered access to advertisers that was unmatchable by other tech providers, he said.
The trial is expected to last at least six weeks and call on dozens of witnesses, with Judge Leonie Brinkema presiding.
Her decision on whether Google has broken antitrust law will come months after the trial. If found at fault, a separate phase of the trial would decide how Google should comply with the judge's conclusion.
Similar investigations into Google's dominance of the ad tech business are ongoing in the European Union and Britain.
In a similar case, Google settled with France's competition authority in 2021 and paid a fine.
Sign Up For Breaking News Alerts
Be in the know. Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
